Checkatrade Takedown & Trader Pressure – Documented Record

Last updated: August 2026

This page documents the removal of a review I submitted to Checkatrade regarding Freedom Homes Architects. The information below is factual, based on written communication, and presented in a neutral legal tone with supporting evidence.

1. Review Submission and Removal

On 3 August 2026, I submitted a review to Checkatrade describing technical issues and delays experienced during my project. The review included factual statements and referenced documented evidence.

On 4 August 2026, Checkatrade notified me that the review had been removed following a takedown request submitted by Freedom Homes Architects. Checkatrade stated that the removal was due to the inclusion of a reference to an external website, which is prohibited under their Review Guidelines.

2. Trader Complaint and Defamation Concern

Checkatrade confirmed that Freedom Homes Architects raised a defamation concern in relation to the review. Checkatrade advised that any future review must contain only statements that can be supported by evidence.

The review remains logged internally within Checkatrade’s system as part of their records.

3. Evidence Supporting the Review

The issues referenced in the original review are supported by:

These items are documented within the project record.

4. Next Steps

I have requested clarification from Checkatrade regarding acceptable wording for a revised review. A compliant version will be submitted once guidance is received.

This page serves as a factual record of the takedown request, the trader’s complaint, and the documented issues referenced in the original review.

Checkatrade live 18th August 2026

Checkatrade

Evidence of Freedom homes on checkatrade

freedom homes checkatrade evidence

Freedom Homes Checkatrade Analysis 0 Zero Rating

Looking good publicly means.

1. Accepting all public reviews, accepting all negative reviews and accepting transparency